The Hungarian uprising of 1956 is often described as a revolt against communism, but the initial events tell a more complicated story. According to CIA files reviewed during historical research at the time, the uprising began not as a political protest but as an anti-Jewish revolt. This was not widely acknowledged then, and it remains a sensitive fact now. Many Hungarians in 1956 viewed their ruling regime and its secret police not simply as communist, but as ethnically distinct from them. They saw the postwar government as dominated by Jews, many of whom had returned from the Soviet Union with the Red Army after the war. The leadership of the secret police, the AVH, was also widely believed to be Jewish, which made it the first target of the population’s anger when the uprising began.
This belief was shaped by earlier events. In 1940 and 1941, when the Baltic states and Eastern Poland were under Soviet occupation during the Hitler-Stalin pact, the NKVD carried out mass arrests, purges, and executions of the local educated class. According to German military archives, these actions were carried out with heavy involvement from NKVD officers who were themselves largely Jewish at the time. These events left a deep mark on local populations. So when Nazi forces entered those regions later, they often found local people already carrying out attacks on Jewish communities. Military reports sent back to Berlin noted that the German army found local populations “solving the Jewish problem” without outside direction. The instruction from German high command was not to interfere.
This is a part of the historical record that is rarely included in mainstream education. It raises difficult questions, but the facts are not new. Several historians documented this pattern after the war, but their work was gradually pushed to the margins of academic and public discussion. David Irving’s findings were based on primary sources, including government and intelligence documents. He was attacked, censored and excluded for bringing this material forward, but the documents remain. Whether or not one agrees with the conclusions, the source material exists and should not be dismissed without review.
( Candace Owens exposes who runs the show)
The reason this history matters today is that the pattern is repeating in more subtle ways. The idea that certain Western democracies are free is undermined by the extent to which their politics, media, and security structures are steered by foreign or unaccountable influences. In the case of Hungary, the postwar regime was seen by the local population as imposed from outside and staffed by people who did not share their culture or loyalties. In modern times, countries like the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany are experiencing a form of political occupation that is not military but ideological and institutional. Elected governments do not act in the interest of their own populations. Foreign policy decisions are made that serve no clear national benefit, while domestic security services are increasingly directed inward.
(Tucker Carlson exposes who owns the US)
In the United States, political and institutional power reflects the same kind of captured structure that existed in Hungary before World War II. No serious candidate for office can advance without pledging support for Israel, and no major institution functions outside that framework. The media, banking, entertainment, education, healthcare, and financial systems, including the Federal Reserve, are controlled through networks of ideological and financial loyalty that serve interests outside the American public. The U.S. military, backed by the defense industry, is used as muscle to enforce this system abroad. Wars are fought not for national defense, but for resource control, regime change, and financial extraction, all managed to benefit the same global networks. Americans are told these are wars for freedom, but the profits and long-term gains always go to the same concentrated power centers. The people who pay the price, through taxes, inflation, and lives lost, have no say in the matter.
(I don't know this man yet)
People are told one story in public while a different reality plays out behind closed doors. This includes the origins of modern wars, the control of information, and the role of corporate and foreign influence in shaping national agendas. Official histories are curated in a way that keeps certain truths out of reach. When citizens push back, they are accused of extremism or bigotry, regardless of whether their concerns are rooted in evidence.
The headline video of David Irving, points to a pattern of historical cover-up, where the facts of who controlled what, and why populations revolted, are buried under more comfortable narratives. The Hungarian case is not isolated, but a part of a wider history of postwar Europe where political regimes were imposed, where accountability was lost, and where certain ethnic and ideological groups took hold of powerful institutions, often in the service of foreign agendas. The backlash from ordinary people was often chaotic and morally difficult, but it didn’t come from nowhere.
(Ken O'Keefe)
In the current environment, asking questions about power, loyalty, and historical truth is treated as dangerous. But if history is to have any value, uncomfortable facts cannot be ignored. Governments are not above criticism, and neither are those who influence them from behind the scenes. What happened in Hungary in 1956 was beyond a rebellion against communism, and was in essence, a revolt against a regime seen as foreign and imposed. The lessons of that moment are relevant again today, not because history repeats itself in the same form, but because the mechanisms of control, through intelligence, ideology, and institutional capture, are back in place.
The countries that actually need a root and branch regime change are the US, UK, Canada, France, Australia, New Zealand, Germany, Netherlands and all that belong to NATO. Iran does not a regime change, nor does Venezuela, Cuba, Russia, China or North Korea. These are countries that refuse to be occupied. A sober reading of the facts shows that the official story is often not the full story. If that can be true in Hungary, it can be true in the West today. Ignoring it won’t make it disappear.
Point of note:
America, UK, and most major European countries have the same problem as Hungary back then.
You have to read the true history, everything we have been taught and told is a lie.
It’s important to learn about what actually happened back then because these same events continue to affect the world today.
Everything you are taught is backwards and upside down. Search and listen to Ron Unz and Mike Witney interview. Read The Unz Review june 4th 2018 by Ron Unz. Also The American Pravda ( The American Conservative) April 29, 2013 by Ron Unz.) Origins of WWII by AJP Taylor 1961. Read William Henry Chamberlain - America's Second Crusade 1950, most important historian is David Irving, read his seminal history books he debunked mad Hitler narrative. Harry Elmer Barns book Perpetual War for perpetual peace 1953, also Revisionism and Historical Black out - Harry Elmer Barnes, then Charles E Beard book President Roosevelt and the Coming of War, 1941.
(I don't know this man yet)
This tweeter thread is quite informative: @BasedSamParker https://x.com/BasedSamParker/status/1938375995226292474?s=19
If you think my voice should be heard louder then PLEASE support by becoming a PAID SUBSCRIBER. I’m here for your raw, straight, and dedicated analyses. Your support is appreciated. Thank you.
buymeacoffee.com/ggtv
Share this post