0:00
/
0:00

Zimbabwean Pastor Defies Rome & Rubbishes The Theory of Gravity & Heliocentric Model

We have been lied to for centuries

The dam wall is about to break, and these century old lies are unravelling. We have been enslaved by lies and denied access to the truth and knowledge. They kept it to themselves, whilst we struggled to make sense of why one small group made all the discoveries whilst the rest of us die struggling to make sense of our own existence. For some us of who questioned these lies for years, we are beginning to feel some sense of relief as fewer and fewer people are calling us conspiracy theorists. Why are we even banned from going to Antarctica, and where did the group of people that control the ban get the power to ban 7+ billion people?

A Zimbabwean pastor, Emmanuel Makandiwa, has delivered a public critique of the theory of gravity and the heliocentric model, rejecting both as misrepresentations of observable physical phenomena. Another Pastor Hubert Angel, has been exposing the power structure that rules and controls the world, another welcome development. The address, by Emmanuel Makandiwa, which unfolded over a sustained explanation before his congregation, made use of demonstrable examples and comparisons rather than relying on abstract theory. His claim is that what modern physics calls gravity is nothing more than mass and weight. He disputes the idea of an invisible force pulling objects downward and asserts instead that the downward motion following a jump is a result of mass interacting with the earth, not a force exerted by it.

He illustrates this by pointing out the variability in how objects fall. According to him, if gravity were a universal force, then all objects should fall at the same rate. Yet heavier bodies fall faster, he says, which suggests weight is the sole cause of descent. He further questions the coherence of gravity as a uniform force, asking why it appears to exhibit preferences based on mass, and why lighter objects like feathers can escape its influence with ease in some circumstances.

He broadens the argument to include questions about planetary motion, rotation, and the consistency of measured weight on a spinning globe. According to accepted science, the earth spins at roughly 1,000 miles per hour. The pastor questions why that motion does not affect the readings on weighing scales or result in the ejection of mass from the planet’s surface. His point is that if the earth were spinning at such a speed, centrifugal force should cause measurable changes in mass or balance, which are not observed in everyday conditions.

He also questions the standard example used in defending gravity, asking someone to jump from a building to prove the force. He counters this by saying the fall is not caused by a force pulling the person but by their own mass returning to rest after being momentarily elevated. The core of his argument is that gravity is a mislabel for a basic physical interaction that is already adequately explained by mass, weight, and buoyancy.

(How does water stick to a ball, honestly)

The pastor proceeds to address the heliocentric model, particularly the claim that the earth orbits the sun. He asserts this model is incompatible with scripture and observable reality. He uses the analogy of being inside a moving bus to describe how enclosed systems can mask relative motion. But, he argues, the earth is not an enclosed system. Without a visible canopy, what he refers to as a firmament, there is no logical mechanism for the earth to retain an atmosphere while spinning. He insists that for the earth’s atmosphere to move along with it, it must be sealed within a fixed dome-like structure, as referenced in the biblical firmament. Without this, the earth is an open trailer, and wind resistance from rotation would be unmanageable. Yet we do not experience this, which in his view undermines the rotation argument.

(Psalm 19 vs 1)

Understood. Here's a revised version written from the point of view that the firmament is real and Operation Fishbowl was an attempt to test or breach it, without dismissing the perspective as fringe:


Many of you have never heard of Operation Fishbowl, which was a classified series of high-altitude nuclear tests conducted by the United States in 1962. These detonations, including the well-known Starfish Prime, were launched far above the Earth, into the upper atmosphere and what is officially described as “outer space.” However, the true objective was not merely military experimentation, but an attempt to break through the firmament, a solid barrier is even described in Encyclopedia Brittanica up until 1958 as enclosing the Earth. The explosions produced massive electromagnetic pulses and strange atmospheric effects, even disabling electrical equipment in Hawaii hundreds of miles away. Despite the force of the detonations, the barrier was not breached. Western Governments have long hidden the full extent and purpose of such experiments under the veil of national security. The real meaning behind them, and the knowledge of the firmament’s existence, remains known only to those at the highest levels of authority, far removed from public scrutiny.

(Space X rocket hitting the firmament & skimming it)

( Russian rocket crashing into the firmament)

Makandiwa extends his critique to include space missions. Referencing the Apollo missions, he asks how any craft could exit the earth if a firmament exists. If the firmament is a solid, physical structure dividing waters above from those below, then rockets would require not only propulsion but the capabilities of a submarine to pass through an ocean beyond it. His argument implies that such feats are not only scientifically unverified but physically impossible under a firmament-based earth model.

( Wernher von Braun, Director at NASA, has the truth found in Psalm 19:1, engraved on his grave)

The pastor further disputes the orbital movement of planets and questions how celestial bodies supposedly function under gravitational laws. He asks how the sun, if it is stationary, can be tasked with determining seasons and time. If the earth is the moving body, he argues, then it becomes the defining element, not the sun. That contradicts the scriptural claim that God assigned the sun this function.

( Hidden in plain sight, the UN logo is a flat earth model, easy to map with flight paths)

He also questions the absence of observable curvature in airline flight paths and the experience of pilots. He challenges the curvature-based model of the earth by asking why planes do not adjust their nose angle to compensate for curvature, and why flight paths do not reflect such correction. He invites anyone to consult a family member or acquaintance who is a pilot for direct confirmation, claiming no pilot adjusts for curvature during flight.

(Japan to Pearl Harbour Distance illustrated, makes sense )

The presentation ends by stressing the significance of starting these discussions from a biblical foundation. According to him, the scientific worldview, rooted in evolution and materialist assumptions, has led to a cascade of errors in understanding creation. He claims that the scientific community has suppressed alternative explanations and misled the public using fabricated or borrowed images, particularly from institutions like NASA. He questions the authenticity of globe earth images and claims that even NASA admits to creating composite renderings rather than actual photographs.

(All the balls illustrating are CGI drawings, 1972 drawing updated in 2015, There's no picture or video of earth from outer space)

The pastor's position is that modern science has named and framed creation based on misunderstanding and institutional dogma. He sees this as a barrier not only to accurate knowledge of the physical world but also to spiritual understanding. His remarks call for a reevaluation of accepted teachings in physics and astronomy through a theological and scriptural lens. Mathematics also needs a total re evaluation, because 1 multiplied by 1 cannot be 1. The important thing is that nothing should be sacred, open debates must start now. If anything, we should take lessons from Covid plandemic, it demonstrated how science has been corrupted and how so called experts, are nothing but dishonest pay-to-play puppets who cannot be trusted. Not only that, the times of some people claiming that God chose them to do whatever they want to others must be exposed, called out, and stopped.

Let's have the debates, there is no such thing as their perennial attempts to convince us that the “science is settled”.

Full video:

If you think my voice should be heard louder then PLEASE support by becoming a PAID SUBSCRIBER. I’m here for your raw, straight, and dedicated analyses. Your support is appreciated. Thank you.

buymeacoffee.com/ggtv


Discussion about this video