These Psychopaths, Zero Shame
John Kerry: "Agriculture contributes about 33% of all the emissions of the world."
"We can't get to Net Zero... unless agriculture is front and centre as part of the solution."
"You just can't continue to both warm the planet, while also expecting to feed it. It doesn't work."
"So we have to reduce emissions from the food system."
John Kerry lying that agriculture is responsible for about a third of the world's emissions, and that we cannot reach so-called "Net Zero" targets unless the food system is fundamentally changed. His argument rests on the belief that continuing to feed the world while dealing with a warming planet is no longer possible unless we drastically cut emissions from farming.
This kind of thinking to mislead the indoctrinated world, is dangerous. This psychopathic agenda of treating the natural processes of life as problems to be eliminated. The carbon dioxide produced by agriculture is not a pollutant in the way smoke from a factory chimney might be. CO2 is a naturally occurring gas, essential for plant life. Without it, crops do not grow. It is, quite literally, plant food. Photosynthesis, the process by which plants turn sunlight into energy, depends entirely on carbon dioxide. When levels of CO2 rise, many plants grow more efficiently and produce better yields. Besides that, CO2 is a trace gas, only 0.04℅ of the earth's atmosphere.
To claim that agriculture must be “reduced” to meet climate targets is to ignore this basic truth. Of course, there are real concerns about pollution and the health of our ecosystems, and no one is suggesting we ignore those. But lumping agriculture into the same category as oil drilling or industrial waste shows a misunderstanding of both science and nature. It is one thing to aim for cleaner practices and less waste; it is quite another to say that the very act of growing food is harmful to the planet.
The idea that we must cut back on farming in order to save the environment has little to do with actual environmental care and everything to do with control. Framing agriculture as a threat allows unelected global bodies to push for top-down changes to how food is grown, distributed, and consumed. It leads to policies that risk food shortages, restrict farmers, and reduce the ability of communities to feed themselves.
Feeding the world and caring for the Earth are not opposites. They go hand in hand, as they always have. The real threat is not the farmer or the field, but the idea that feeding people is somehow a crime against the planet.
They want more control over our lives.
If you think my voice should be heard louder then PLEASE support by becoming a PAID SUBSCRIBER. I’m here for your raw, straight, and dedicated analyses. Your support is appreciated. Thank you.
buymeacoffee.com/ggtv
Share this post