The Escalation Nobody Admits As Russia Fears Decapitation Strike
Moscow Responds to Perceived Western Targeting with Combat-Ready Nuclear Posture
If a few more people choose to become paid subscribers, Popular Information could expose more lies, root out more corruption, and call out more hypocrites. So, if you can afford it, please support this work.” Thank You.
buymeacoffee.com/ggtv
Russia has resumed midnight mobilisations of its mobile nuclear ICBM units. This decision follows the collapse of the New START Treaty, which previously regulated such movements and required advance notification to the United States. Without this oversight, Russia is no longer compelled to disclose its nuclear deployments, removing a major guardrail that had limited the risk of miscalculation. These mobile units, previously monitored, are now being covertly relocated at night to avoid satellite detection. This shift increases strategic opacity and heightens the risk of escalation.
The trigger appears to be a growing belief in Moscow that the West may be preparing for a decapitation strike. This concern stems from operations such as Spiderweb and Rising Lion, reportedly aimed at neutralising Russia’s nuclear second-strike capabilities. The assumption is that the West, possibly guided by AI-enabled targeting systems and supported by real-time intelligence platforms like Palantir, is now capable of striking with a level of precision previously unthinkable. The Russians appear to believe these systems are designed to eliminate command-and-control nodes before a response can be ordered.
In response, Russia has elevated its readiness posture. Convoys of mobile ICBMs now move with armed escorts, reportedly consisting of at least 40 personnel per unit. This security escalation is a clear acknowledgement of the vulnerability exposed during prior operations in the Middle East, where ground-based sabotage played a decisive role. Moscow is adapting those lessons for its own nuclear deterrent strategy. At the same time, the use of camouflage, darkness, and dispersal aims to preserve retaliatory capacity and complicate Western targeting.
Another element now factoring into Russia’s calculus is the alleged Western knowledge of missile locations. Russian intelligence claims that NATO powers, including the United States and the United Kingdom, have acquired operational knowledge of mobile ICBM routes. This compromises Russia’s deterrence model, which depends on survivability and the credible threat of retaliation. Without mobility, that deterrent becomes a sitting target. Russia’s mobile leg of the triad is no longer assumed to be secure, and the strategic posture has adjusted accordingly.
(The RS-28 Sarmat ICBM)
Alongside these movements, wider geopolitical shifts are being formalised. On September 3rd, China and Russia will sign a new military agreement in Beijing. This will formalise military and nuclear cooperation and is expected to include mutual coordination in Europe and Asia. The agreement is timed to coincide with Putin’s visit to China and follows a period of neutrality by Beijing on Ukraine. If signed as planned, the agreement will mark the end of Chinese ambiguity on the war. It will also solidify a strategic bifurcation between East and West. The new axis will be openly military.
This follows a significant deterioration of Western-Russian relations. Britain has once again become a host for US nuclear weapons, with tactical bombs relocated from New Mexico to RAF Lakenheath. This is the first time since 2005 that the UK has received such weapons, and their deployment is unlikely to have escaped notice in Moscow. It adds further weight to Russian perceptions that the West is preparing its own theatre for escalation.
At the same time, NATO has increased reconnaissance flights aimed at locating Russian mobile assets. Ukraine has stepped up deep strikes inside Russian territory, reportedly with Western encouragement. Germany is now openly advising Ukraine to target airfields and ammunition depots far from the frontlines. This comes as Russia prepares to increase drone assaults against Ukraine, possibly launching up to 2,000 drones per day, a scale which may overwhelm most known air defences.
New fronts are also forming. Iran and Russia are conducting joint naval exercises in the Caspian Sea. Iran claims to have replaced all air defence systems damaged in the war with Israel and now hosts Russian air defence units protecting the Bushehr nuclear plant, where over 200 Russian scientists are based. Coordination between Iran and Russia appears to be deepening, including renewed diplomatic links at the senior level.
Meanwhile, the role of Azerbaijan has drawn attention. Russian state media now claims Azerbaijani operatives supported the sabotage of mobile nuclear assets. The use of Azerbaijani diaspora within Russia for logistical support is being investigated. If confirmed, this would place Azerbaijan at the centre of a potential retaliation axis, caught between Iran and Russia and exposed in the Caspian.
The Western response continues to evolve. Intelligence reports suggest China is now supplying artillery to Russia via North Korea. The munitions are likely rebranded to obscure origin. This would explain the volume and persistence of Russian artillery fire and highlights China’s deeper involvement despite its public neutrality. That neutrality is due to end in September.
Several Eastern European states are also taking steps that imply they expect conflict to spread. Estonia is preparing for a Russian advance by disabling roads and withdrawing from the Ottawa Treaty, which restricts landmine use. Lithuania is building bunker systems along its border and testing them against heavy ordnance. These are not precautionary gestures but signals of active war planning.
(The RS-24 Yars Intercontinental Ballistic Missile )
Taken together, the developments suggest the global balance of power is entering a sharper and more dangerous phase. Military postures are shifting from deterrence to deployment. Alliances are being redrawn with a speed and clarity not seen since the Cold War. Both blocs are preparing for multiple-front escalation. The treaty systems that once governed nuclear restraint are dead. What remains is a reliance on secrecy, manoeuvre, and the hope that deterrence remains intact in practice, if no longer in writing. The next two months, Trumps 50 days ultimatum should we say, may show whether that hope is still warranted.
Authored By:
If a few more people choose to become paid subscribers, Popular Information could expose more lies, root out more corruption, and call out more hypocrites. So, if you can afford it, please support this work.” Thank You.
buymeacoffee.com/ggtv